|
The best slave is the one that believes they are free!
Individual Rights and Individual Sovereignty goes hand-in-hand. You can not have individual rights without individual sovereignty, because freedom from external control is the basis for all individual human rights.
I think, therefore I am, so I declare, my Individual Sovereignty.
The balancing mechanism that establishes justice for all, is individual freedom and responsibility.
Individual freedom without individual responsibility is Anarchism - survival of the fittest.
Individual freedom with individual responsibility is individualism - means peace and tranquility to all.
Group control with individual responsibility is organized religion - goodness is the selling point to give up your individual freedom.
Group control without individual responsibility is a socialistic dictatorial government - security is the selling point.
Extremism is on both ends, only individualism is moderation and morally right.
|
Febuary 20, 2012
Response to Jury Commission
Return To The Top
Official Oppression, conspired to commit treason.
Timeline of events:
I received a jury service notification on February 19th that I had 10 days to complete the form, sign it and send it back.
On the 20th of February, I sent back a notarized three page affidavit refusing to sign, stating that I could no longer give my allegiance to a body politic that is functioning outside the framework to which the constitution gives its legitimacy, functioning no different than that of an organized crime syndicate as in the Mafia or the Nazi regime. In effect I have relinquishing my citizenship. I was making a moral objection as to not to be complicit in criminality and not to commit treason. In the affidavit, I gave them fourteen(14) days to respond.
On the 9th of March eighteen(18) days after the affidavit was sent, I received a post card claiming I failed to return the jury qualification form and to call 782-3157 to resolve the matter. On the 12th of March, I called to clear up any miss understanding. Kathy Miles said that I didn't return the form and I asked if she read the affidavit, and she said no. I said, if you had read the affidavit then you would know why I didn't sign the form. Then I was told that a notice went before a judge on February 29th to make a determination. That ended the conversation.
On the 13th of March, I sent a notarized affidavit of a default judgment, a permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or act against myself, a sovereign on the land.
On the 20th of March, I received a notice to fill out the form and return it by April the 4th, or that an order to show cause was filed and to appear in court on April the 26th, with the treat of a $300 fine and 60 days in jail.
On the order to show cause, the reason was "In the matter to the failure of prospective juror to appear before the jury commission".
On the 22nd of March, I sent a notarized affidavit to the Judge, Ryan W. Boyer, explaining what had transpired with the jury commission, and in order to have a controversy with the Jury Commission, they have to have standing. In order for the State of Idaho to have a cause of action against me, I have to be a member of their body politic and/or have done harm upon another living individual's person or property or have committed force, fraud, deception and manipulation, on another. Not being a citizen, they no longer had standing or jurisdiction.
On the 3rd of April, I when to the court house to resolve the issue by making an appearance. I wanted to talk to Cathy to explain that the ramifications of her actions was violating my unalienable rights and sovereignty, and committing treason herself. The very point of the existence of her job is to protect my unalienable right to say "NO"!
When I first spoke, I said I was here to resolve the issue regarding jury duty. At that time, she said you only have two options, either sign the form or go to court on April 26. I asked if I could talk to her manager and so she when to get her. When her manager returned, I asked her if she had read the affidavit and she said yes. So, at that time I handed her an affidavit of the Constitutional qualifications to be president. As she was reading it, I put her on notice that Obama did not constitutionally qualify as president and that it is imperative that everyone understands their own contractual obligation to the constitution. The inauguration of Barack Obama created a line of demarcation, as to which side of the constitution one can be on. As of January 20, 2009, the federal government under Obama is 100% illegitimate, and the enemy of the constitutional government. Giving one's allegiance to the usurper will put one on the illegal side of the constitution, making one an enemy of the constitutional government.
At that time, a Blackfoot police officer came in and told me to leave. I told the officer that I was trying to resolve an issue that I had a right to be there, but he insisted that I leave NOW! I walked to the door and as I walked out I was met with five other officers and at that time I asked to see the sheriff. The officer that escorted me out, said I was mad and creating a disturbance. I told the other officers, NO, I was not mad, but I was only trying to resolve an issue that I had until April the 4th to resolve and I said, is it not April the 3rd and he said yes. At that time I handed one of the officers an affidavit of the Constitutional qualifications to be president, and asked him to read it. Then I got out more copies and asked if any of the other officers wanted to read the document. While handing them out, I putting them on notice that Obama did not qualify. Then a plain clothed detective came and said I had to leave the building. He and the main officer escorted me out and then I spent about 15 minutes outside explaining the situation to them. I gave him and the officer an affidavit of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right and Sovereignty.
On the 4th of April, I called Sheriff Dave Johnson, of the Bingham County. I told him I needed his help in resolving an issue I have with the Jury Commission. As the result of the incident yesterday, I might need him to escort to do my business in preparing for court. We discussed the situation that I was in.
I told Dave that because I was no longer a citizen, that they didn't have jurisdiction over me. As a result of the notice constitutional qualifications to be president, everyone is now a party to the controversy and everyone had a conflict of interest and I didn't know how they were going to resolve the issue. He said that he understood, and that he would talk to the judge.
Because of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's news conference on the 2nd of March exposing the fraud of Obama's birth certificate, on 5th of April, I contacted the Sheriff by e-mail about the fact that I had a moral objection to being complicit in the crimes of the government and refused to commit treason.
The Press was not taking him seriously and was personally attacking him. I explained that with the issue coming from a different angle, where it is a citizen that doesn't want to commit treason but being forced to, would make the press and federal government have to take notice.
On the 10th of April, I went into the Shelley Police Department to file the complaint, and talked to a Robert Tincher (208) 357-3446 and he took the report, numbered 2012-00435.
On the 11th of April, I was contacted by Officer Tincher and he referred me to the Attorney General of Idaho, because of Bingham Counties conflict of interest. So, I contacted by Office of the Attorney General (208) 334-2400, the receptionist said that they don't do it that way and it has to go through the normal process. I called Officer Tincher back and he said that he would talk to his supervisor see what he could do.
Robert later called and told me that he would try and deliver my case that night to Scott, the county prosecutor, and Scott would have it by morning. I told him I was concerned about the upcoming hearing to show cause and he reassured me that he would stay in contact or Scott would get a hold of me.
On the 18th of April, I called Officer Tincher to get the number of Scott and another officer told me that the county prosecutor didn't accept calls from the public.
On the 19th of April, I called 782-3101, for Scott Andrew with regards to case numbered 2012-00435. Left my number to get back with me.
On the 26th of April, I appear in the court of Ryan W. Boyer. When I was called, I stated: " I am here in this court of record to make a special appearance in my personal capacity to challenge or contest the jurisdiction of the court." Before I could get it all out, I was jumped by two officers, telling me I had to cross the bar. I said "I will cross the bar retaining all of my unalienable rights and waving none by agreement with the court." With no response from the Ryan, I was accosted by the two officers to sit down at the table and talk into the microphone, so I complied.
Ryan asked me if I was going to sign the document and I asked him if he had read the affidavit that I sent with the Jury Commission. He said yes, and I said: "If one has the ability to say "Yes", one has the right to say "No". The main function of government is to protect one's unalienable right to say "no".
Then I brought up Obama's eligibility and explained that I would not commit treason. He asked if I would sign it and I said no, so he had me arrested and jailed for 5 days with a $5000.00 bail. I was released by signing the form "under duress forced to commit treason".
On the 27th of April, I met with Scott Andrew to discuss the lawsuit against the state.
»
Posted by Stephen Wadsworth
Comments welcome at
Individual-Sovereignty Forum
|
|
|
|
Febuary 20, 2012
Affidavit refusing to sign.
Return To The Top
Stephen Wadsworth
376 Edwards Ave
Shelley, Idaho 83274-1225
20/February/2012
Jury Commission
501 N. Maple #205
Blackfoot, ID 83221-1700
To who it may concern,
In reference to Jury Service Notification:
It has come to my attention that what represents the body politic is functioning outside the framework to which the constitution gives its legitimacy where it is functioning no different than that of an organized crime syndicate as in the Mafia or the Nazi regime. Just as one who drives the get away car in a robbery is as guilty as the one that holds the gun, one who gives their allegiance to organized criminality is as guilty as the agent of government that commits the crime.
No one can comply with what is right from wrong and continue to give their allegiance to a criminal body politic. As such, I can no longer give my allegiance to pure criminality and stay in honor. The violations against the rights and sovereignty of the individual are too numerous to list here.
One of the unintended consequences of the Nuremberg trials, is that it taught us that a government and its leaders are held responsible for violating one's individual rights and individual sovereignty; and can not hide behind the mentality that "I was just doing my job".
As a peaceful man desiring to avoid conflict and live lawfully with maximum freedom, I present you with a Notice of Understanding and Intent, and Claim of Right and Sovereignty in order to avoid any further confusion or potential conflict.
Affidavit - Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right and Sovereignty:
I am a man of flesh and blood blessed with a living soul to serve my creator alone, do hereby make oath and state the following as True and Law that becomes self evident.
Whereas:
It is my understanding that:
There are only two states of being, true and false. Reality is the state of being true. Reality establishes what one can and cannot do determined by the laws of nature. Therefore, reality establishes right from wrong, by the right to act. Reality is the ultimate authority and the final arbiter. One defies reality at their own demise.
Reality establishes that everyone has a life independent one from another, which gives one their right to protect that life from anyone that wants to violate it. This framework establishes that no one on earth is god and has the right or authority to violate another's individual rights and individual sovereignty. In order to get someone else to do what you want, you have to provide a positive benefit in order to get their consent, otherwise, you are violating their individual rights and individual sovereignty, through force, fraud, deception, and manipulation. This establishes what is right from wrong when it comes to each individual's right to interaction. A violation of one's individual rights and individual sovereignty, is a crime against humanity. The only thing that can bind two individuals together is by their consent only. Therefore, all law between individuals is by contract and all contract is law only between those individuals that have agreed. Lawful and legal are two different things. Slavery can be made legal but it is never lawful.
The idea that man can create law that objectively effects another without their consent is in a state of delusion of grandeur committing a crime against humanity. "The Declaration of Independence" only reaffirmed the reality of self ownership that everyone is born free and sovereign without subjects to which the Revolutionary War was fought against this criminally insane mentality, and the criminally insane lost. Defense is a moral imperative, because the price of individual freedom is eternal vigilance against this criminally insane mentality.
A body politic is only a state of mind, which one enters or exits a body politic by their consent only.
Government is an artificial construct, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, where a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them. Those acting as agents of the fiction are bound by their own actions in interacting with another living sole. NO one can hide their own criminality behind a fiction in reality.
Governments are instituted among men in order to protect and maintain one's unalienable rights and sovereignty. Therefore, the jurisdiction of any court of that government, is limited to the protection and maintenance of one's unalienable rights and sovereignty in order to have standing.
A statute, act, code or regulation, is defined as a legislated rule of the body politic with which has been given the force of law, to rule only those that have given their consent. Legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions. Those in the government are merely playing roles, actors of in their fictitious roles. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a fiction in reality no different than the Easter Bunny. One first has to believe, in order to give a fiction power. When one gives their consent to be governed, they are empowering their own enslavement.
Fictional legal entity only gives the illusion of authority, rather than lawful authority, which can only be used as the force of law upon only those that give their consent. It is impossible for a collective to have more power and authority than each individual has, individually.
I am hereby notifying all who read this and any other interested parties that I have revoked my consent to be governed by fictitious corporate entities with which I do not have a subsisting contract. I declare that I am neither a child nor a slave, but a free sovereign adult capable of administering my own affairs.
Furthermore I claim:
The right to establish for me or anyone under my care a FEE SCHEDULE payable in gold or silver coin for any transgression(s) against me, my family or anyone under my care that is or are perpetrated by peace officers, government principals, agents or justice system participants, those fees being FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated, and ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00) PER HOUR if handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without due cause, and a minimum of ONE MILLION DOLLARS($1,000,000.00) for any violence or harm brought against me, my family or anyone under my care, and TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00) PER DAY if any personal property is being taken away from me without my express written and Notarized consent.
The right to choose a lawful method of payment upon demand, and; The right to use a Notary Public, commissioner or any two (2) people not related to me by blood or marriage to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or anyone under my care or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way, and; The right to engage the services of a Notary Public or commissioner for taking affidavits and/or any two (2) people not related to me by blood or marriage to attest to my signature for verification purposes, and which does not constitute adhesion, contract or change in status in any manner, and; The right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
This is a judicial notice that has the full force and effect of law against any other living sole that wants to transgress on my unalienable rights and sovereignty. Because a crime against humanity is in the purview of individual rights and individual sovereignty, a Court of Sovereignty is the highest court in law and has jurisdiction over everyone, which will be used if all other courts neglect to follow the rules of law and due process of law.
If you do choose to respond with corrections, I must insist that you do so within Fourteen(14) days of service of this letter, in writing, via registered mail and provide proof of your claim, under oath or attestation with full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. A lack of response or response that does not contain proof of my mistaken understanding, on a point-by-point basis, will be assumed to imply agreement with my understanding. Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or act against myself, a sovereign on the land.
I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
_________________________________
Stephen Wadsworth
In witness whereof, I officially verify the authenticity of the signature applied to this document above and
here by set my hand and official seal on this day of _____ February, 2012.
Notary Public: ____________________________
»
Posted by Stephen Wadsworth
Comments welcome at
Individual-Sovereignty Forum
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2012
Notice of default judgment
Return To The Top
Stephen Wadsworth
376 Edwards Ave
Shelley, Idaho 83274-1225
13/March/2012
Jury Commission
501 N. Maple #205
Blackfoot, ID 83221-1700
Dear Kathy Miles,
In reference to Jury Service Notification:
I received a post card on March the 9th, claiming I failed to return the jury qualification form and to call 782-3157 to resolve the matter.
I sent the form back with a notarized notice of understanding and intent and claim of right and sovereignty on February the 21th.
On March the 12th, I called the number to clear up any miss understanding. I was told that the notice went before a judge on February 29th to make a determination.
The Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right and Sovereignty is a judicial notice that has the full force and effect of law against any other living sole that wants to transgress on my unalienable rights and sovereignty.
Failure to respond with corrections within Fourteen(14) days, which would have been by March the 6th, resulted in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or act against myself, a sovereign on the land.
I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
_________________________________
Stephen Wadsworth
In witness whereof, I officially verify the authenticity of the signature applied to this document above and
here by set my hand and official seal on this day of _____ March, 2012.
Notary Public: ____________________________
»
Posted by Stephen Wadsworth
Comments welcome at
Individual-Sovereignty Forum
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2012
Notice to Contract with Ryan W. Boyer
Return To The Top
Stephen Wadsworth
376 Edwards Ave
Shelley, Idaho 83274-1225
22/March/2012
Jury Commission
501 N. Maple #205
Blackfoot, ID 83221-1700
Ryan W. Boyer acting as Magistrate Judge,
In reference to Jury Service Notification:
To abide by the rules of law and due process of law, one must follow the steps of conflict resolution through discussion, negotiation and if necessary, adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction in order to stay in honor. I am now expanding the reach of my discourse in order to maintain my honor and ensure maximum clarity between myself and all agents of government.
As per the Affidavit - Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right and Sovereignty dated 20th of February 2012, I clearly gave notice of relinquishing my consent to the body politic known as "The State of Idaho". Failure to register a dispute against this claim within Fourteen(14) days resulted in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or act against myself, a sovereign on the land.
For the record one will ascertain:
In order for there to be a controversy with the Jury Commission, they have to have standing. Jury Commission has no standing.
In order for the State of Idaho to have a cause of action against me, I have to be a member of their body politic and/or have done harm upon another living individual's person or property or have committed force, fraud, deception and manipulation, on another. The court has no jurisdiction.
If it is hereby ordered that I shall make a special appearance, as a sovereign on the land, before the court and you want to contract with me in your private capacity it will cost $4000.00 a day payable in advance. The Fee Schedule in the - Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right and Sovereignty, will be applicable in all other situations.
Warning:
Notice: Forcing or compelling a person's unpaid involuntary performance / servitude or exercising ownership direction or control over a person is a Criminal offence that carries terms of imprisonment.
Causing or forcing a person to enter or engage in debt bondage, definition: ("involuntary forced payment") is a Criminal offence that carries terms of imprisonment ... (Conduct yourself accordingly)
To restore my reputation, let me make it perfectly clear, I do not consent nor do I contract. I am not a member of your body politic. I have NOT committed a crime by violating another's unalienable rights and sovereignty in order to have a cause of action in a Court of Sovereignty. There is no jurisdiction or corpus delicti.
To up hold the rule of law the burden of proof is on the one that makes the claim. I hope this clears up all false assumptions and presumptions that you might have in this matter and I look forward to a resolution to the false accusations in these matters.
I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
_________________________________
Stephen Wadsworth
In witness whereof, I officially verify the authenticity of the signature applied to this document above and
here by set my hand and official seal on this day of _____ March, 2012.
Notary Public: ____________________________
»
Posted by Stephen Wadsworth
Comments welcome at
Individual-Sovereignty Forum
|
|
|
|
April 10, 2012
Official oppression, conspiring to commit treason.
Return To The Top
Filing the complaint with the Shelley Police Department:
10/April/2012
Official oppression, conspiring to commit treason.
A private trespass on one's person is a crime against humanity, which has lawful consequences by any representative of government.
I have a moral objection to being a criminal and committing treason, myself. Forcing me to interact with the illegitimate government that has usurped the Constitutional government, is forcing me to commit treason against the Constitutional government.
The Nuremberg defense that "I was just doing my job", and what they are doing in their individual capacity has no effect on national illegitimacy is a logical fallacy , because where the head goes the body follows. By their complicity gives a sense of legitimacy to the illegitimate government which allows the fraud to continue to function.
If one has the ability to say "yes", one has the one's unalienable right to say "no". The core principle of government is to protect one's unalienable right to contact giving the government legitimacy by the consent of the governed.
Once one has known the truth, they can't claim ignorance and turn their back. The axiom of the rules of law, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse".
Every representative government has a fiduciary responsibility to understand the contract (constitution) that they were sworn to uphold.
When the representatives of government act outside the purview of the contract, they are acting in an illegitimate capacity, therefore committing an act of treason. When the representatives of government create a law that violates one's individual rights and individual sovereignty, the law has committed a crime against humanity and they have committed an act of treason. When the representatives of government enforce an illegitimate law that violates one's individual rights and individual sovereignty, they are committing a crime against humanity and an act of treason.
When one fails to act in their private capacity, they also lose their governmental immunity.
»
Posted by Stephen Wadsworth
Comments welcome at
Individual-Sovereignty Forum
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2012
Chain of Authority
Return To The Top
Chain of Authority
There are only two states of being, true and false. Reality is the state of being true. Reality establishes what one can and can not do determined by the laws of nature. Therefore, reality establishes right from wrong, by the right to act. Reality is the ultimate authority and the final arbiter.
Because reality establishes that everyone has a life independent one from another, one has the right to protect that life from anyone that wants to violate it. This framework establishes that no one on earth is god and has the right or authority to violate another's individual rights and individual sovereignty. In order to get someone to do what you want, you have to provide a positive benefit in order to get their consent, otherwise, you are violating their individual rights and individual sovereignty, through fraud, deception, and manipulation. This establishes what is right from wrong when it comes to each individual's right to interaction.
Reality establishes the right to act and interact by consent only.
A constitution is a contract that forms a body politic call government that creates a contractual obligation with the duty to protect in return for the duty of allegiance which is a reciprocal obligation pledge.
One enters and exits a body politic by their consent only. The purpose of government, set out in " The Declaration of Independence", is to protect and maintain one's unalienable rights and sovereignty. Therefore, the jurisdiction of any court of that government, is limited to the protection and maintenance of one's unalienable rights and sovereignty in order to have standing.
A constitution is an agreement between individuals, who exchange their allegiance to a body politic, for the promise of protecting and maintaining one's unalienable rights and sovereignty. This contract between individuals to which the government that it creates, is how that government is to function. "Government" is the servant to those which who created it. The contract's validity supporting government's existence, only exists for as long as it maintains the unalienable rights and sovereignty of the individual , because its legitimacy is ONLY derived from the consent of the governed.
"Constitutional rights" is a misnomer, because people don't understand what the Constitution is. Constitutional rights are the rights or framework the government entity can function in. Outside the context of the contract, the government has NO rights.
When the representatives of government act outside the purview of that contract, they are acting in an illegitimate capacity, therefore committing an act of treason. When the representatives of government create the color of law that violates one's individual rights and individual sovereignty, they have committed an act of treason and they have committed a crime against humanity. When the representatives of government enforce an illegitimate law that violates one's individual rights and individual sovereignty, they have not only committed an act of treason but, they have committed a crime against humanity.
One of the unintended consequences of the Nuremberg trials, is that it taught us that a government and its leaders are held responsible for violating one's individual rights and individual sovereignty; and can not hide behind the mentality that "I was just doing my job". Because a crime against humanity is in the purview of individual rights and individual sovereignty, a Court of Sovereignty is a legitimate forum to bring indictments against the guilty parties, try them and if found guilty, execute for crimes against humanity.
A Court of Sovereignty has jurisdiction over everyone.
»
Posted by Stephen Wadsworth
Comments welcome at
Individual-Sovereignty Forum
|
|
|
|
May 07, 2012
OnLine Petition
Return To The Top
Petition
We, the undersigned, have been informed that Stephen Wadsworth has been arrested and jailed on April 26th, for failure to commit treason against the constitutional government.
On February 19th, Stephen Wadsworth received a jury service notification that he had 10 days to complete the form, sign it and send it back. On the 20th of February, he sent back a notarized three page affidavit refusing to sign, stating that he could no longer give his allegiance to a body politic that is functioning outside the framework to which the constitution gives its legitimacy, functioning no different than that of an organized crime syndicate as in the Mafia or the Nazi regime.
Stephen Wadsworth was making a moral objection as not to be complicit in criminality and not to commit treason.
On the 10th of April, Stephen Wadsworth went into the Shelley Police Department to file the complaint: Official oppression, conspiring to commit treason, by talking to a Robert Tincher (208) 357-3446 and he took the report, numbered 2012-00435.
We, the undersigned, ask that the complaint go forward following the rules of law and due process of law in a competent court of law.
Sign Petition
»
Posted by Stephen Wadsworth
Comments welcome at
Individual-Sovereignty Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|