Davo and JJ's latest adventure_Political Forum.com

DavidHenry · Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 836 Location: Australia

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=26303

This forum appears to be tolerant of us for the moment, however, a number of anti-Zionists have been banned, so it's probably just a matter of time before we're outed as anti-semites, nazis, losers, loners, miserable, unemployed, uneducated etc, etc.

This thread contains plenty of intellectual dishonesty, bewilderment, and creative denial of the Jewish status in the media......unfortunately, it also lacks an appreciation of the difference between right and wrong, in fact, I don't think JJ or I have ever encountered any pro-Zionist/Jew that knows the difference, ie, individual rights leading to the formation and enforcement of objective ethics.

DavidHenry · Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 836 Location: Australia

http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/politics/2044-being-true-political-mentality-26.html

DavidHenry · Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 836 Location: Australia

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?p=429122#post429122

Being that Ali and Rati are stupid Jews asking stupid questions, I'm not going to try and reason with these "fuckheads", instead, I'm just going to talk over the top of them with some old fashioned truth.

Back in 2001, I had never heard of Zionism, but even back then I was exposed to a list of Jews who dominated the US mass media+ we have at least 2 lists compiled in 2004 which both update and confirm Jewish dominance of the media, IOW, for some time, Jews have been the dominant force in the media regardless of any shuffling that may have occurred of late.

The purpose of Ali and Rati's stupid questions are purely an attempt to raise uncertainty regarding the obvious, ie, they're pro-Jew/Zionist and don't want the truth about Jewish occupation of media made public, especially when anyone with half a brain accepts that the media are the ones who inform the public of what's deemed newsworthy.

If the general public became aware that Jews dominated the media as far as ownership or key positions in many instances, and they became aware that Jews are a tiny 3% minority pop of the US, they might become suspicious, in fact, they might be inclined to consider a purge just based on the ethnic mis-representation, let alone the horrible truth as to why the Jews have secured ownership and positions of influence throughout the media.

If Ali and Rati had any brains, they'd simply admit that by and large, Jews own and control the mass media, and devote their energies to questioning the relevance of that fact, rather than deny the obvious, and ask two utterly idiotic questions.

Their questions are...."what is a Jew", and "what is control"......now let's think about the first part of "what is a Jew"......why oh why would they want little ole me to define that, when scores, if not hundreds of google searches confirm that these people are Jewish.....so let's use good ole Sumner Redstone as an example.....not only is he Jewish as provable via a google search of a number of mainstream entries, he was one of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world...do you really think he'd allow his ethnicity/religion to be constantly mistaken?

Don't you think it would be totally moronic for anti-Zionist's to create a Jew list, and make fundamental errors regarding the list's ethnic or religious backgrounds, IOW, if they declared Sumner as Jewish, yet a quick google search contradicted this, then the entire list would become questionable.....do you really think they'd be that incompetent?

DavidHenry · Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 836 Location: Australia

For those of you who’re sane, have you noticed that the people in this religion thread flirt with philosophy, but as per their output, clearly know little about it?....and remember, philosophy is no different to science as far as being current is concerned, ie, just as we don’t rely on 16th century science anymore, neither should we rely on antiquated principles of logic and knowledge.

Being that I have an interest in philosophy, and being that I own scores of books on science and philosophy{text, popular, technical}, I’m well aware that most philosophers consider philosophy intellectual callisthenics if not gymnastics, however, that’s not the case with Objectivists….we believe that Objectivism has properly and totally outlined what epistemology and metaphysics are all about.

Of course, due to the overwhelming disrespect paid to philosophy even by the actual philosophers themselves {one idiot describes philosophy as talk about talk….what a wanker}, it comes as no surprise that anonymous online hero’s such as found in this thread are regurgitating that same idiotic line of thinking, blissfully unaware of Objectivism’s technical superiority, if not of Objectivism’s existence.

But here I am, a self declared expert on Objectivism and the philosophy of science, and no-one’s taking me seriously….people keep talking shit about shit and refuse to actually discuss the basic details of knowledge and logic…..of course this would lead to unescapable conclusions concerning the bogus claim of God’s existence, but people are content to talk nonsense about “not being able to prove a negative”, whilst clearly having no idea of what they’re actually saying/regurgitating.

I’ll tell ya something for nuthin…..the universe is eternal, and God has never existed….these are 2 absolute facts that can be denied, but can’t be refuted without exposing oneself to logical fallacy……but I can’t seem to raise any serious discussion on those 2 basic facts,….. hopefully this longwinded talk about talk might stir a few of you melon heads in to switching your brains on.

I want to point out to you, that none of your famous philosopher hero’s have ever developed a secure epistemology, and FYI, Objectivists can’t stand Kant’s take on philosophy, although to his credit, he seemed to be aware of the dubious ethical practices of the Jews he encountered…..but either way, let’s hear which epistemology you favour and why….well actually I know why, ie, it supports subjectivism.

I’ve yet to hear anyone endorse the notion of individual rights{something that most religions seem to violate}, and obviously, none of you have the foggiest idea of what an objective ethical code might look like, let alone the prospect of forming an entire objective ethical system based on individual rights and Objectivism+objective science.

As for morality, how utterly ridiculous is it to propose something non-existent as the ultimate external enforcer…..damn, it sounds like you’ve created a series of ethical systems designed to fail and be breeched by anyone in a bad mood or under duress.
When I’m under stress, I can simply fall back on my objective knowledge of what constitutes right from wrong, it makes little practical difference that any transgressor or combatant is clueless, I can stick to my guns and never have to incur a pang of guilt even if others stridently object to my actions.

So come guys, especially those pretending to be philosophically literate, please provide me with a single piece of evidence for God’s existence, and please inform me exactly how you determine right from wrong, otherwise have the courtesy to shut up and listen as I enlighten you.

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=26711&page=24

====================

As usual, we've got total silence regarding ethics, specifically how one determines right from wrong, yet somehow these clowns know we're wrong about virtually everything Shocked

DavidHenry · Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 836 Location: Australia

http://www.individual-sovereignty.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=219

Gday Jews and thrillseekers, I've been banned again....I was a bit naughty this time, so I won't rant and rave as I normally do, other than to inform you that despite my inappropriate language, people continue to call JJ and I all sorts of names, eg, racist, bigot, anti-semite, hate mongers, stupid, uneducated, teenaged etc....yet they're never warned or banned.......seems as though people still prefer the Jews to me and JJ, and that sux!!!

Btw Rati, if you're reading this..... http://www.individual-sovereignty.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=219

I explain why the God concept is nonsense, and there's no room for doubt.....atheism or bust!!!!!!!!

DavidHenry · Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 836 Location: Australia

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27221&page=3

Jenifer Johnson · Joined: 03 May 2004 Posts: 654 Location: California

I have a new definition of a Jew.

It is an adult living in a state of illusions of grandeur trying to using falsehoods to manipulate reality so they can live in a constant state of adolescent.

DavidHenry · Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 836 Location: Australia

Yep, and unless people are willing to study philosophy/ethics/critical thinking.....they'll remain in that state.

DavidHenry · Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 836 Location: Australia

I notice some of these fools asking you why you consider them sociopaths or advocates of might makes right......but as yet, none of them have explained how they determine right from wrong in an objective sense, and most of them prefer to not have to even deal with such things as individual rights.

It's about as silly as someone who can't count asking why we'd doubt their ability to measure Rolling Eyes